CHEW
Cat Health and Wellbeing Questionnaire (CHEW)
Owner-completed 33-item generic feline quality-of-life survey across eight published domains. Batched into eight per-domain screens to reduce completion fatigue.
Overview
- Developer
- Freeman, Rodenberg, Narayanan, Olding, Gooding, Koochaki
- Year published
- 2016
- Species
- Feline
- Domain
- Quality of life (general wellness)
Structure and administration
33 items in eight subscales (physical functioning, vitality, social functioning, emotional health, general health, coat and grooming, appetite, environment). 5-point Likert (0-4), total range 0-132.
Owner-completed, 8-12 minutes — batched into eight per-domain screens.
Cut-off and interpretation
- Cut-off threshold
- 33
Source: Freeman et al. 2016 emphasise change tracking over a single categorical cut-off. Sightline applies a four-band severity classification keyed off the total range: minimal 0-32, mild 33-65, moderate 66-98, severe 99-132, alongside per-subscale totals.
Citation and validation
Freeman LM, Rodenberg C, Narayanan A, Olding J, Gooding MA, Koochaki PE. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in healthy and unhealthy cats. J Feline Med Surg 2016;18:689-701.
Revisions
- v1.0 (Freeman, Rodenberg, Narayanan, Olding, Gooding, Koochaki 2016) — original 33-item development and validation in 1,303 cat owners.
Target population
Adult cats whose owners want a generic quality-of-life read across eight domains rather than a disease-specific instrument. Validated in both healthy and unhealthy cats.
Available languages
English (UK)
Licence
Free for research and clinical use with citation. Validated in a 1,303-owner cohort. Founder review confirms wording with the rights holder ahead of public launch.
Scoring algorithm version
sightline-chew-v1.0.0
Strengths
- Eight published subscales let clinicians and owners see exactly which domain is shifting (mobility, vitality, social, emotional, general health, coat, appetite, environment).
- Validated in a large cohort (1,303 owners), giving stronger psychometric grounding than smaller-cohort instruments.
- Free for research and clinical use with citation.
- Sightline batches the 33 items into eight per-domain screens, so owners face a clear 'one domain at a time' flow rather than 33 single-question screens in a row.
Limitations
- Generic by design, so it cannot replace a disease-specific instrument when osteoarthritis, dental disease, or another specific condition is the focus.
- 33 items is long for fortnightly tracking; Sightline defaults to a quarterly cadence (90 days) and pairs CHEW with shorter instruments like FMPI-SF for in-between check-ins.
- Phase 1 ships English (UK); founder review confirms wording with the rights holder ahead of public launch.
Why Sightline uses it
CHEW gives Sightline its most granular view of feline wellbeing without requiring a specific diagnosis to be in place. Pairing CHEW (broad QoL) with FMPI-SF (musculoskeletal) and CSOM (owner-defined activities) gives a multi-axis read across population-validated, validated-and-targeted, and household-specific signals. The eight-domain subscale breakdown also maps onto the kind of conversations vets have with owners about quality of life — not 'is your cat okay?' but 'which of these eight things has changed?'